AI has undoubtedly brought significant advantages, especially in academia, benefiting both students and teachers. For educators, AI has made it easier to identify instances where students may have used AI unethically to produce unoriginal work. Meanwhile, students benefit from AI’s ability to clarify concepts, generate content, and assist with assignments.
However, the rise of AI in education has also led to the development of AI detectors designed to identify content generated by AI. These detectors play a crucial role in ensuring academic integrity, but they’re not without their flaws. Many students around the world have expressed concerns about being falsely accused of using AI-generated content when, in fact, their work is original.
To help you avoid such pitfalls, I’ll introduce you to some of the best AI detectors you can use to pre-check your assignments. Here are the best AI detectors of 2024 that you can use to identify what part of the content is AI-generated and what is human-written.
Criteria to Select your Optimal Ai Detectors
As I tested multiple AI detectors, I carefully noted the criteria by which I would measure their overall performance. It's essential to choose tools that offer precision, reliability, and practical application in real-world scenarios. Here’s a refined set of criteria to guide your selection:
Accuracy in Detection: A good AI detector should consistently identify AI-generated content with high accuracy. It’s crucial for the tool to distinguish between human-written and AI-generated text effectively, without frequent false positives or negatives.
Resilience to Manipulation: The detector should not be easily fooled by minor changes, such as the addition of a typo or the removal of punctuation. The ability to maintain detection integrity despite small alterations in the text is key.
Comprehensive Testing Capability: The tool should perform well across a variety of inputs, including different writing styles and content types. It should handle both straightforward and complex text accurately, ensuring versatility.
Integration with Plagiarism Checking: A valuable AI detector might also include a plagiarism detection feature, enabling a holistic evaluation of content. This dual function ensures that content is not only AI-free but also original.
User-Friendly Interface: The tool should offer an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, allowing users to paste text and get results quickly. Efficiency in processing and delivering clear, actionable insights is important for practical use.
Affordability and Accessibility: While quality often comes at a cost, the best AI detectors balance affordability with performance. Tools should provide reasonable pricing structures, ideally with a trial option for users to assess the tool's effectiveness before committing.
Comprehensive Support and Updates: Regular updates and strong support systems are vital. A good AI detector should continuously improve its algorithms to stay ahead of new AI advancements, ensuring it remains effective over time.
Transparency of Results: Finally, the tool should provide clear explanations for its detection outcomes. Transparency in how scores are determined helps users trust and understand the tool’s performance.
Accuracy of Popular AI Detectors
Let's take a look at some of the free and paid AI detector tools that I reviewed and tested to ensure that my reviews are not biased and are based on actual results, giving you the most accurate AI detector tools.
6 Popular AI Detectors:
ZeroGPT is a web-based AI detection tool that offers a solid, accessible solution for those needing to identify AI-generated content. It’s primarily free to use, allowing users to check up to 150,000 characters at a time. This makes it convenient for most short and medium-length documents. The platform also supports file uploads, generating results in seconds, which is great for quick and easy AI detection.
While ZeroGPT performs well, it's important to manage expectations. It's not the most advanced tool available and doesn’t guarantee 100% accuracy. That said, it’s a reliable option for casual users or those looking for a straightforward, no-cost tool to verify their content. For more extensive or critical needs, exploring other AI detection tools might be beneficial.
I was fairly pleased with Copyleaks’ AI detection tool. Despite being web-based, it requires a registration process that takes about a minute or so, which I found inconvenient, especially for those in a hurry or close to a deadline. However, the interface is simple, with all the necessary tools to help create quality content.
Copyleaks is designed to be more than just an AI detector; it’s an all-around cheat detection tool. It works well alongside other writing tools like Grammarly and the Hemingway app, making it a great addition to any professional writer's toolkit. As a plagiarism checker, Copyleaks is easy to use and provides reliable results, which are beneficial for improving writing skills and ensuring originality.
One of the standout features is its ability to handle various file types and the availability of a mobile app, making it particularly useful for students. However, canceling the service can be a bit tricky, as the provided instructions may not always match the current interface, leading to some frustration. Despite this, I didn’t hesitate to trust the software for its primary function, as it performs admirably in detecting plagiarism and AI-generated content.
QuillBot brings back the good old memories of being in school when we all used the same assignment and submitted it. QuillBot is a great paraphrasing tool that allows you to quickly and easily rephrase content while maintaining its original meaning. But with the rise of AI-generated content, the need for tools to detect such content has become more critical, and that's where QuillBot AI Detector comes into play.
While the detector is effective at identifying AI-generated text, it's not without its limitations—occasional false positives and challenges with more nuanced writing are areas where it could improve.
Overall, QuillBot AI Detector is a valuable tool for students, educators, and content creators who want to ensure their work is original. Version 15.342.0 is a free AI detector that can identify content generated by tools like ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Gemini. While it's not the most advanced AI detector on the market, its integration with QuillBot makes it a practical choice for safeguarding against AI-generated content.
Undetectable.ai doesn’t just let you know what part of your text is questionably AI-generated content; it helps you humanize it too. So, if you're close to a deadline and want to submit an assignment, this might be the best option so far. Undetectable.ai provides a streamlined interface where you can paste your text, check for AI content, and even humanize it with a simple click. It categorizes the text based on its AI detection likelihood, telling you whether it’s human, AI+human, ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, or Gemini-generated, making it a versatile tool for students and professionals alike.
During the test, Undetectable.ai successfully passed AI detection, but once I fixed the grammar mistakes, the content became detectable again. This suggests that while the tool is effective in helping users evade detection initially, it still requires careful use.
Winston AI performs similarly to GPTZero, with a very familiar interface and predictably accurate results in AI detection. It effectively highlights which parts of my content are AI-generated and which are not, whether from GPT-3, GPT-4, Gemini, Claude, or a combination of human and AI input. I find Winston particularly useful because it caters to both web publishers and academics. Whether I’m writing a blog post, a research paper, or an article, Winston AI helps me ensure my content is authentic and free of AI-generated sections.
One of the standout features for me is the integrated plagiarism detection. I no longer need to visit another website or platform; everything is conveniently built into Winston. This not only saves me time but also ensures that my work remains entirely original. The free signup is another plus, as I can start using the tool immediately without needing a credit card. When I need to share my findings, I can easily print out reports or upload various document types, including Word documents, PDFs, or even scanned images.
Right off the bat, Content at Scale AI might not be the top choice for students, where the use of AI detectors is particularly popular. However, I was extremely impressed by the platform's capabilities. The content produced is well-structured, allowing users to create SEO-friendly material with minimal editing before publication. Although the price is a bit steep and the lack of a free trial is disappointing, Content at Scale is still worth considering for its advanced features and effectiveness.
Content at Scale is a web-based paid tool. It is best suited for those needing to produce large quantities of long-form content, such as bloggers and corporations. Despite the lack of a free trial, familiarizing yourself with the platform’s tools can help optimize your use of the service.
Methodology
The reviews I’ve provided aren’t just random opinions like 'I prefer this AI tool.' I took the time to thoroughly test each tool to ensure my recommendations are based on actual performance. Let me walk you through the methodology I used to determine which AI detector excels at detecting AI-generated content in various forms, including essays.
I tested each tool using three 100% AI-generated texts, one mixed text, and two human-written texts to assess their accuracy. Below is a table of the essays I selected for this test.
Human Written Articles | |||
---|---|---|---|
S.No |
Topic |
Publication Date |
|
1 |
Learner persistence – the productive struggle |
2019 |
|
2 |
Creating effective classroom displays – encouraging belonging and ownership |
2021 |
|
100% AI-Generated Articles | |||
S.No |
AI Tool |
Topic |
note |
3 |
ChatGPT |
Learner persistence – the productive struggle |
Asked ChatGPT to rewrite the entire article# 1 |
4 |
Claude |
Astronomy |
Written by Claude |
5 |
Gemini |
Technology |
Written by Gemini |
50% AI - 50% Human | |||
S.No |
AI Tool |
Topic |
note |
6 |
ChatGPT |
Creating effective classroom displays – encouraging belonging and ownership |
Asked ChatGPT to rewrite half of the article# 2. |
After spending some time gathering, writing articles on my own, and rewriting articles with various AI models, here are the results:
Article No. |
ZeroGPT |
CopyLeaks |
QuillBot |
Undetectable AI |
Winston AI |
Content at Scale |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
AI: 0% |
Human |
AI: 0% |
Human |
Human: 100% |
Human |
2 |
AI: 0% |
Human |
AI: 0% |
Human |
Human: 100% |
Human |
3 |
AI: 51.22% |
AI Content Detected |
AI: 100% |
AI |
Human: 31% |
Hard to Tell |
4 |
AI: 100% |
AI Content Detected |
AI: 100% |
AI |
Human: 0% |
Reads like AI! |
5 |
AI: 100% |
AI Content Detected |
AI: 100% |
AI |
Human: 0% |
Reads like AI! |
6 |
AI: 5.67% |
AI Content Detected |
AI: 0% |
Human |
Human: 46% |
Hard to Tell |
When evaluating the results, some AI detectors provided vague responses about whether the text was human-written or AI-generated. Additionally, a few tools offered a percentage indicating how much of the content they believed to be AI-generated.
Based on the testing, CopyLeaks stood out as the most accurate, consistently detecting AI content and correctly identifying human-written material. However, it lacked the ability to provide a detailed percentage breakdown between human and AI writing. ZeroGPT delivered solid performance but stumbled slightly with mixed or partially AI-generated content, showing some inconsistency. QuillBot and Winston AI, on the other hand, had more variable results, particularly when dealing with mixed content, indicating that these tools might struggle to accurately assess nuanced or blended texts.
If you look closely, both CopyLeaks and ZeroGPT produced very similar results and were successful in detecting traces of AI content in all our samples. However, with these mixed results, it can be a bit challenging to determine which one is the best to use. You can consider this when deciding on the right detector for yourself: Do you need a binary answer, like the one provided by CopyLeaks, or do you prefer to see the closest percentage of AI content used, as indicated by ZeroGPT?
In general, AI detectors analyze the provided text and estimate the likelihood that it was created by either a human or an AI. For example, if a detector shows "50% AI", it doesn't imply that exactly half of the text was written by AI. Instead, it means there's a 50% chance that an AI wrote the text and a 50% chance that a human did. Essentially, this indicates that the tool isn't very certain about the authorship of the text.
Price (Free & Paid) And Features
AI Content Detector |
Pricing |
Supported Formats |
Additional Features |
---|---|---|---|
ZeroGPT |
Free for 15,000 characters $7.99/month |
Text (Input directly into the tool) |
Detects AI content from various tools like ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Gemini; notable for ease of use. |
CopyLeaks |
$8.33/month (annual) $10.99/month (monthly) |
Text, Pdf, Docx, HTML, and more |
Supports OCR for scanned images; integrates with plagiarism detection; provides detailed reports. |
QuillBot |
$19.95/month $99.95/year (part of paraphrasing tool) |
Text input within Quillbot interface |
Detects AI-generated content and provides in-depth reports; highlights AI vs. human content; no free trial. |
Undetectable AI |
$9.99/month |
Text ((Input directly into the tool) |
Highlights AI-generated content; provides suggestions for humanizing text; useful for urgent deadlines. |
Winston AI |
Free: 2000 words $18/month |
Docx, .Png, .Jpg |
Integrated plagiarism detection; OCR technology; printable reports; designed for web publishers and academics. |
Content at Scale |
Starts at $49/month (Low-Volume Subscription) |
Text ((Input directly into the tool) |
Creates high-quality, SEO-friendly content; no free trial; effective for large-scale content production. |
ZeroGPT: Suitable for individuals or small teams needing reliable, quick AI detection. Best for those who need real-time analysis without a heavy focus on additional features.
CopyLeaks: Ideal for educators, academic institutions, and content creators who need comprehensive detection tools and multi-language support. Best for users requiring integration with educational tools and API access.
QuillBot: Best for students and professionals who frequently use paraphrasing tools and want integrated AI detection alongside grammar and citation tools. Suitable if you're looking for an all-in-one writing assistant rather than just AI detection.
Undetectable AI: Suitable for writers or students needing to rephrase AI-generated content to make it appear more human-like. Best for those under tight deadlines who need a quick and effective 'humanization' of content.
Winston AI: Great for academics, researchers, and professionals who need detailed AI detection and plagiarism checks. Best if you work with various file formats and require advanced features like OCR and bulk rewriting.
Content at Scale: Perfect for SEO specialists, content marketers, and businesses that need to generate large volumes of content. Best for users focused on SEO optimization and planning, with minimal manual editing required.
Bonus Tips for Using Free Version of AI Detectors
It's common for AI detectors to impose word or character limits on free versions, after which they require a subscription or payment. If you're looking to save money, you could split your text into smaller parts to stay within the free usage limits. This can be a practical way to manage your content detection needs without incurring extra costs.
How to Justify Yourself if you’re Wrongly Judged as AI Cheating
When using AI detectors, it's important to understand that no tool is 100% efficient. Some detectors might mistakenly flag your content as AI-generated, even if it's entirely human-written. This can be frustrating, especially if you're wrongly judged as cheating. If you find yourself in this situation, here are a few ways to justify your work:
Provide a Revision History: If you’ve been working on your document over time, a revision history can show the progression of your writing, proving that it was manually created. Platforms like Google Docs and Microsoft Word often have built-in version histories that can be shared.
Oral Presentation: Offer to explain your work in an oral presentation or a viva-style defense. This can help demonstrate your understanding of the content, which AI tools can't replicate.
Write in a Distinctive Voice: Develop a unique writing style that reflects your personality or expertise. This could involve using specific phrases, colloquialisms, or a particular tone that is uniquely yours and hard for AI to mimic.
Provide a Draft: Share your initial drafts or notes. This can serve as evidence that your work is original and developed through a traditional writing process.
By being proactive and transparent, you can protect your work and your reputation from being unfairly labeled as AI-generated.
FAQs
1. How can I select the right AI detector for my needs?
Selecting the appropriate AI detector involves considering your unique needs, budget, and desired features. Start by identifying the most essential factors for your use, like detecting plagiarism, supporting different file formats, or offering real-time results. Then, compare popular tools based on these priorities. Reviewing user feedback and trying out free versions can also help ensure you make a well-informed choice before investing in a paid plan.
2. Do AI detectors maintain the privacy of the content being analyzed?
Yes, trusted AI detectors prioritize strong privacy safeguards. Generally, they do not retain or disclose the content you analyze and comply with stringent privacy standards. It's advisable to review the AI tool's privacy policy to verify that your data is handled securely.
Balancing Innovation and Accuracy
AI tools have significantly revolutionized the writing landscape by producing exceptional content that is rich in knowledge, creativity, and diverse writing possibilities. However, with this surge in AI-generated content, AI detectors have emerged with specialized technology designed to understand and accurately detect content produced by AI engines. Yet, the race between AI and AI detectors is blurring the line, making these detectors not always the most reliable form of judgment.
Therefore, if you choose to use AI assistance, it's crucial to keep your work original and ethical, ensuring you only utilize AI within permitted boundaries. In this article on the top 6 AI detectors, you'll surely find the one that best suits your needs, helping you navigate this evolving landscape responsibly.
For educators and professionals looking to track the impact of AI on writing, AI detector tools can be invaluable in distinguishing between AI-generated and human content. To maintain comprehensive records of your findings, consider using WPS Office to organize your data in spreadsheets or summarize your results on the effects of AI tools in educational settings.